Tures. tests; (b) 130 and 150 C--the aggregate-binder mixing temperatures.33.955 1.30.636 1.22.603 0.31.745 0.5.0

Tures. tests; (b) 130 and 150 C–the aggregate-binder mixing temperatures.33.955 1.30.636 1.22.603 0.31.745 0.5.0 0.0.0 100 Boiling test PMB-A
Tures. tests; (b) 130 and 150 C–the aggregate-binder mixing temperatures.33.955 1.30.636 1.22.603 0.31.745 0.five.0 0.0.0 one Cholesteryl sulfate In Vivo hundred Boiling test PMB-A PMB-A-F PMB-B PMB-B-F 145 Mixing – WMA PMB-A PMB-B 165 Mixing – HMA PMB-A-F PMB-B-F(a)Figure 6. Outcomes from the dynamic viscosity testing the investigated polymer-modified bitumen Figure six. Final results of your dynamic viscosity testing ofof the investigated polymer-modified bitumen (PMB) ahead of and right after foaming (F) evaluated at: (a) 100 –the temperature of in the boiling water (PMB) before and following foaming (F) evaluated at: (a) one hundred C–the temperature the boiling water stripping tests; (b) 145 C and 165 C–the aggregate-binder mixing temperatures. stripping tests; (b) 145 and 165 –the aggregate-binder mixing temperatures.Figure 6 6 presents the results of dynamic viscosity testing with the polymer-modified Figure presents the outcomes of dynamic viscosity testing of the polymer-modified bitumen binders sourced from the two refineries. InIn this case, the variations in dynamic bitumen binders sourced in the two refineries. this case, the variations in dynamic viscosities of those binders were far more pronounced, together with the PMB-B binder exhibiting viscosities of those binders have been a lot more pronounced, using the PMB-B binder exhibiting larger values. What exactly is far more, the course of action of foaming had different effects in in this case. the course of action of foaming had diverse effects this case. Each larger values. What Each polymer-modified binders exhibited important drops in dynamic viscosityfoaming polymer-modified binders exhibited substantial drops in dynamic viscosity right after soon after foaming at the temperature in the boiling stripping test (100). At greater testing temat the temperature with the boiling stripping test (one hundred C). At greater testing temperatures, peratures, this effectvisible. visible. this effect was much less was less Figure 7 7 presents the SBP-3264 Autophagy values of your structural indices depending on the measurements of Figure presents the values on the structural indices based on the measurements of ATR-FTIR spectra on the investigated paving-grade and and polymer-modified binders with the investigated paving-grade polymer-modified binders sourced ATR-FTIR sourced from each refineries. from each refineries.0.6Carbonyl Sulfoxide Polybutadiene Polystyrene0.055x value0.0330.five.0261.099 0.0.849 0.0.847 0.1.134 0.Since it may be seen in Figure five, the paving-grade bitumen binders obtained from two 1.two 40.0 various suppliers presented related viscosity characteristics inside the investigated temperature 35.0 As shown in Table 2, the binders had been also very equivalent with regards to penetration variety. 1.0 and softening point. The non-foamed binders exhibited nearly identical values of dynamic 30.0 0.eight viscosity. It was also observed that foaming had little influence on this house of both 25.0 asphalt binders. The mean values of dynamic viscosity of the foamed binders were 20.0 0.six slightly larger than in the case of the non-foamed bitumen, but the variance inside the information was 15.0 big (specifically at 130) to permit any strict conclusions within this regard. It was also 0.4 observed right after the testing that both foamed paving-grade binders presented tiny foaming ten.0 prospective. 0.Dynamic viscosity, (Pas)0.377 0.0.482 0.(b)0.40804Materials 2021, 14,Each polymer-modified binders exhibited important drops in dynamic viscosity soon after foaming in the temperature of your boiling stripping test (100). At larger testing temperatures, this impact was les.